Dakota Pacific Development

A 3rd District judge must still decide whether the controversial development agreement makes it on November's ballot.

The Summit County manager could make a final decision at a public hearing July 28.

They want a judge to order the county clerk to verify the signatures she rejected in a petition to put Dakota Pacific’s development to a countywide vote.

Residents could take the county to court, but the developer is pursuing a new, separate agreement that a referendum couldn't stop.

What the Kimball Junction development would look like didn't change much — who's in charge did.

Summit County says the company's new application closely resembles the agreement OK'd in December.

Kimball Junction development and North Summit fire controversies returned to the fore at HB356 public input sessions.

The Summit County Clerk's Office is waiting to formally declare residents' petition insufficient.

State law cleared the way for a controversial development. Here's what happens next.

Little more than a dozen residents turned out for a public hearing about the future of Kimball Junction traffic.